Generations marched, fought and died for the right to vote. By having those figures available, the government will know for sure exactly how many votes each party has acquired for the election, leaving no room for error in the event of undecided voters.
Compulsory voting is wrong and should not be forced on anyone.
Another figure seen as worrying low would give fuel to those who say our democracy is broken and to those who recommend radical solutions to fix it.
It is not power that makes a person corrupt but giving power to a corrupt person that troubles the entire system and its people. Not using the power to cast vote is like wasting the sacrifices that our freedom fighters made making India a free and democratic nation.
Reason is very much clear that people no more believe in any of the contesting candidates. Creating awareness amongst people for voting is not the way to ensure that everyone castes their votes.
Image caption Some researchers suggest first-time voters should be compelled to take part in elections "Our democracy is facing a crisis if we do not take urgent action to make elections more accessible to the public and convince them that it is worth voting," he said.
Because they could not choose, they decided to leave the decision up to one voter who was sure of one theory. The least we can do now is treat that right like a responsibility. Had the other occupants of the lifeboat given empty, compulsory votes, they could have made a decision under pressure that led to their demise.
Only the learnt and socially aware citizens shall follow the norm but what about the larger proportion of poor and illiterate people of the nation? The Institute for Public Policy Research, a centre-left think tank, highlighting a "dramatic social class divide in electoral participation", has advocated compelling first-time voters to turn out to try to "kick-start voting as a habit of a life-time", with the proviso that the option of "none of the above" should be available on the ballot paper.
These same individuals claim that voters who do not participate muddle the voting pool because the number of individuals who did not participate could have swayed the outcome of the election in another direction. Creating awareness amongst people for voting is not the way to ensure that everyone castes their votes.
Only the learnt and socially aware citizens shall follow the norm but what about the larger proportion of poor and illiterate people of the nation? Compulsory voting is wrong and should not be forced on anyone. We complain about the fact that a larger proportion of politicians in India have criminal charges against them and those are not the charges that were put on them after they came into power.
Of course, the most important question to consider when discussing mandatory voting is whether or not voting is important at all. Like jury duty and basic education, the potential benefits of mandatory voting far outweigh any perceived infringements of freedom, making a strong case for mandating the vote.
Both sides strive for acceptance, each claiming to outweigh the other, but before casting judgment on either side of the argument, it is important to understand the most prominent pros and cons of each to decide why compulsory voting would do more harm than good.
But the idea of enforcing civic duty such as jury or military service is established in democracies around the world. Core to that liberty is electing representatives and voting on public issues.
A solution to this problem is compulsory voting. For this reason, many individuals choose not to vote because they are uncertain of their choices or harbor equal faith for all parties on the ballot.
It is high time that voting should be made compulsory in India. But the most basic is also the most appropriate: Mr Winnick pointed out that, at the last general election, "those who did not vote were larger in number than those who voted for any one of the political parties contesting the election".
When voting is mandated by a government and every legal individual turns in a vote, this ensures that the government has a solid number to work with.
If the other occupants of the lifeboat were forced to cast votes for their preferred theories, they would have given empty votes. When a significant proportion of the voting public chooses not to vote, the result of such an election is skewed in favor of those who exercised their right to vote.
Making elections a compulsory act for every individual that owns a voter ID will ensure maximum number of turnouts and hence alert the corrupt leader of their falling down. The right to vote is the most fundamental tenet of democracy and yet millions do not exercise it. However, only one person casts a vote because that person is the only one certain of one specific theory.
First and foremost, mandatory voting will ensure that election results truly reflect the will of the voting public. Australia is one of only 11 countries which enforce participation in elections.Argumentative Essay: All Citizens Should be Required by Law to Vote Every citizen has the right to vote, yet so many people don’t vote, with the turnout at just 64% for the presidential election, and voter turnout rates decreasing steadily in most established democracies.
Aug 21, · But in Australia, where voting became compulsory inthat’s been a marginal issue. The existence of a mandate has made voting a meaningful shared national experience. Some Republicans will oppose mandatory voting for the reason they now push voter IDs: to win.
(Conventional wisdom says the more people who vote, the worse the GOP does). But if a tactic of. Compulsory voting has made the Australian political system unresponsive.
If voting were made voluntary, it would shake up the political system. Parties and candidates would have to do more to convince people of the merits of their policies in order to get voters to the polls. Voting in the United States Should be Required by Law.
At present, the United States does not require its citizens to vote. As a consequence, voter turnout during presidential elections has been traditionally low - between 50 to 60 percent of the population that is eligible to vote. Before deciding whether voting should be compulsory or optional, understanding what exactly is meant by the term ‘compulsory voting’ is essential.
It is also important to educate the general public more about politics so they can make an informed decision if and when they do choose to vote. Should voting be compulsory or should we have a right not to vote?
April 29,Taylor & Francis Each year, millions of people fail to vote without reproach.Download